WeHo City Council Will Be Asked to Regulate Local Drones

Amazon sees them as a future way to quickly deliver products to its customers with no traffic delays. In Japan they have been used for years to deliver pesticides and fertilizer to steep hillside fields. And the Orangutan Conservancy uses them to track those endangered animals in Sumatra and Borneo.

DroneBut in West Hollywood the drone is best known for a crash into a power line on Sunset Boulevard at Larrabee Street in October that left hundreds of residents without electricity. Then there’s the drone that a local resident, speaking before the City Council, said he feared took too close at look at him while he relaxed on his apartment balcony less than fully dressed. And there’s the one that surprised residents of the French Hill Apartments on Olive Street when it landed in their pool.

The West Hollywood City Council will be asked on Monday to join the federal and state governments in enacting measures to regulate so-called “unmanned aircraft systems.” The measure, brought forward by City Councilmember Lauren Meister, would:

    • Require registration and a permit for operation of any unmanned aircraft in the City (a major problem, Meister notes, is the difficulty in finding the owner of a drone that has caused a problem)
    • Prohibit unmanned aircraft (hobby/recreational and commercial) from interfering with manned aircraft, operating at night, operating within 25 feet of persons not involved in operation, operating inconsistent with state or federal flight rules, capturing visual images or audio recordings of persons without consent when a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, flying 350 feet or less above a public or private school during school hours without permission, capturing visual images of public or private school grounds during school hours without permission, flying within the airspace above City parks, City Hall and sheriff and fire stations, and interfering with firefighting, police, or emergency response activity;
    • Prohibit unmanned hobby/recreational model aircraft from operation beyond the operator’s visual line of sight or higher than 400 feet above ground, as FAA rules do not apply such limitations to commercial UAS operations;
    • Provide exemptions for government-operated UAS and hobby/recreational or commercial unmanned aircraft that have received permission from the FAA to operate beyond the limitations of the ordinance; and
      Make violation of the ordinance a misdemeanor.

The Federal Aviation Administration is expected next year to begin imposing requirements authorized under a federal law adopted in xxxx that would set a maximum speed of 100 mph and a maximum altitude of 500 feet on drones. In addition, the proposed FAA rules would allow drone flights only during the day time, bar them from flying over people not involved with them and require testing and a Transportation Security Administration screening of drone operators, who would have to be at least 17.
In her proposal to the Council, Meister notes that certain issues aren’t addressed by state and federal law. They include invasion of privacy (which is addressed by state law only in incidents over privately owned land). Also, her proposal would require drones to be identified with a unique registration number to identify the drone operators.

The item is on the consent agenda for the Council’s meeting on Monday, which means it will be passed without discussion unless a council member asks that it be removed for discussion. The Council will meet at 6:30 p.m. at 625 N. San Vicente Blvd., south of Santa Monica.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

11 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lynn
Lynn
6 years ago

Today a drone just missed hitting a World Class slalom skier in a race, hitting the gate he just passed through. Nice!

Larry Block
Larry Block
6 years ago

Thank you Zam for an excellent rebuttal.

Jennifer
Jennifer
6 years ago

1. Deputy Reform–No.
2. Parking Reform–No.
3. Big Box Bans-No.
4. Drone Control–Finally something Meister can insert her fingers in and be proactive.

Respectfully, this is why she is better as an advocate on behalf of West Hollywood West than as a Councilmember. Hopefully, her proposed legislation won’t be shot down given her conflicts of interest.

Chris Sanger
Chris Sanger
6 years ago

There are few things better and more important things for the council to do than impose some rules about these very intrusive things. They’d be remiss in their duties if they didn’t.

Zam Loomstein
6 years ago
Zam Loomstein
6 years ago

This law is redundant and the author is uninformed. Yet another example of technophobia and uninformed journalism: 1: the FAA announced a drone registration requirement earlier this week along with other items. This renders the first bullet point and later information redundant and inaccurate respectively. 2: Interference with manned aircraft is already illegal and falls under the umbrella of the FAA. 3: 25ft of another person… In such a densly packed city, that’s not possible. 3: the privacy rules already exist for when in your home and even schools. They apply to all situations, including drones. There is no reasonable… Read more »

JJ
JJ
6 years ago

anon4cec…LOL…so true. =)

Dre
Dre
6 years ago

Do we really want to see hundreds of these creepy things flying through the air every day, or every time we look out our windows? This will dramatically ruin the look of our world like nothing ever has before.

anon4cec
6 years ago

The happiest day for a WeHo City Councilperson is to be able to ban something. This will fly through the approval process. (forgive the pun)

Lynn
Lynn
6 years ago

Oops.. FAA will never be able to control their concept…..

Lynn
Lynn
6 years ago

Our overly obsessive culture of “gotta have it now” is in reality a culture of addicts. Amazon, the chief offender and many others willingly feed the supply lines. If one doesn’t have a license they shouldn’t be flying anything, even remotely, like drones, period.

The FAA is way behind the curve with their proposed requirements and will never be able to co trip their concept. A blanket NO should be the answer. Lauren Meister is just the person to dig into this issue and not let it rest.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x