WeHo Landlord Sentenced to Jail for Ellis Act Violation

ADVERTISEMENT

The City of West Hollywood has prevailed in court against West Hollywood landlord Anne Kihagi, who has been ordered to serve five days in Los Angeles County Jail and to pay the city’s attorney fees and costs.

Kihagi was held in contempt of court on Feb. 21 for violating a preliminary injunction that prohibited her from re-renting certain units at her property, an eight-unit building located at 1263 N. Crescent Heights Blvd.

Anna Kihagi, aka Ann Swain and Ana Swain

The preliminary injunction was obtained after the City of West Hollywood intervened in a case against Kihagi, filed by a former tenant, who contends he was wrongly evicted when Kihagi used the Ellis Act as a pretext to terminate all of the leases in the building. Kihagi violated the injunction by re-renting the former tenant’s unit.

The city has been engaged in a legal back and forth with Kihagi since 2008, when it filed a lawsuit alleging that Kihagi notified her tenants that she was evicting them  and then rented one of the already empty apartments to a new tenant. When that tenant told the city what Kihagi had done, Kihagi retaliated, the city alleged, by cutting off his electricity and hot water.

The city and Kihagi settled that lawsuit with Kihagi agreeing to extend for 90-days the tenancy of those she was planning to evict and agreeing not to rent any of the eight units until 2019. However, in 2012 Kihagi rented two apartments in the building in an apparent violation of her agreement with the city because she failed to notify the evicted tenants that they could return at rent-controlled rates. A judge found Kihagi guilty of violating her settlement agreement with the city. However, the state Court of Appeals in 2014 overturned that decision. It determined that two of the four units that Kihagi later rented already were vacant when she withdrew the property from the rental market.

Kihagi also goes by other names, including Ana Swain and Ann Swain, according to Anti Eviction Map, a website that tracks alleged illegal evictions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Ellis Act is a California State Law enacted in 1985 that allows property owners to evict tenants without cause if they intend to remove properties from the residential rental market. Displaced tenants and local governments may file a legal action against landlords if the property is returned to the rental market without following the Ellis Act’s restrictions.

Ellis Act reform is a priority for the City of West Hollywood. An an announcement of the Kihagi decision from City Hall says “the city has advocated at the state level for reform or repeal of the Ellis Act, and the city has a strong commitment to taking actions at the local level to increase tenant protections wherever possible. Shortly after the city was incorporated in 1984, the West Hollywood City Council adopted a landmark Rent Stabilization Ordinance, which was one of the strictest tenants’ rights laws in the nation.”

Kihagi also owns apartments in San Francisco, where she has been charged with illegally evicting tenants in what a city official said was the “most egregious” conduct by a landlord that he had seen in 13 years.

An article in 2015 in SFGate.com reported that San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera filed suit against Kihagi, alleging she “waged a war of harassment, intimidation and retaliation” to force tenants from rent-controlled apartments she owned in San Francisco so that she could raise the rents to market rates.

Herrera said Kihagi bought apartment buildings whose tenants were paying below-market rates and tried to force them out. Herrera said that Kihagi offered to pay tenants to move. If they declined her offer, Herrara said that Kihagi claimed that she or relatives were moving into the building. Under the state’s Ellis Act, a rental property can be removed from rent control quickly if it is to be occupied by its owner or his or her family. Otherwise the property must remain off the market for a specified period of time before it can be re-rented at market rates.

Herrera said Kihagi also tried to force tenants out by setting strict rules for their usage of storage rooms, laundry facilities and other things and was known to cut off utility services such as electricity and water.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kimberly Copeland
Kimberly Copeland
7 years ago

Fortunately, most landlords obey the laws and don’t stoop to this kind of despicable behavior. It’s hard to muster any sympathy for people who buy rent-stabilized buildings with the idea that they can just circumvent laws they don’t like by harassing the tenants or using false owner-occupancy evictions to get them out. If they’re looking to make a quick profit, then they simply shouldn’t buy a building that is covered by rent stabilization laws. There are plenty of other markets to buy property in, and making a bad business decision doesn’t give them the right to torment and torture people… Read more »

Robert Muniz
7 years ago

@weho Landlord: Answer this then, why is it that landlords in West Hollywood think they’re above the law. That, despite rent control and habitability ordinances a great number of landlords choose instead to flaunt the law and abuse their tenants? I assume it’s because of unrepentant greed but I sometimes also think it’s because you have a deep seeded need to bully, threaten and harass people when you think no one’s looking. Care to explain? I have yet to have a decent landlord while living in WeHo and LA for over 27 years. That says a lot about the character… Read more »

WeHo Landlord
WeHo Landlord
7 years ago

WHY do you only allow anti Landlord comments?

Ian Dain
7 years ago

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin Niemöller The lack of private property rights was linked to the Holocaust. I wonder if you will still be cheering when they jail you for smoking tobacco in your… Read more »

Civil Equality Accreditation Group

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin Niemöller The lack of private property rights was linked to the Holocaust. I wonder if you will still be cheering when they jail you for smoking tobacco in your… Read more »

Alvin Anderson
7 years ago

5 days is nothing. They have to give sentences that get the crooks attention and that are sentences that disrupt their criminal behavior. A one year minimum for those faker claiming relatives are moving in or in any way harassing tenants with punitive new rules.

kevin king
kevin king
7 years ago

i was a tenent in the building named in the suit.being evicted in as flagrant a manner as i was, was devestating. ann kihagi deserves more than 5 days in jail and court costs…imo she’ll never pay up

San Francisco tenant (@SFTenant)

A decision is pending in the City of San Francisco case where Kihagi and sisters, Julia and Christine Mwangi waged “a war of harassment, intimidation, and retaliation” against dozens of her tenants—targeting seniors and disabled renters for particularly vicious treatment—to force them from their rent-controlled homes. Maybe she’ll go to prison in San Francisco after LA?

Joshua88
Joshua88
7 years ago

Score one for the good guys. Thank you, Rob Bergstein for clarifying for the people who do not know.

I live in a building that is supposed to have a manager on the premises. Most of us know this, including the former manager. In order to report this, I have to go to City Hall. As I work all day, I never manage to get out of the apartment in time to file a complaint. And yes, I put all this in writing years ago.

Rob Bergstein
Rob Bergstein
7 years ago

Just a point of clarification in your article. The Ellis Act is not used for the purpose of owner or owner family occupancy. The Ellis Act is to remove a building (not individual units) from the rental market. Any Ellised buildings may not be rented out for 5 years or if they are, I believe they have to be offered back to the tenants who were evicted, at their original rent plus any annual rent adjustments from The City over the period of time the unit was vacant. For an owner occupancy or family member (and only certain family members..no… Read more »

Chris Sanger
Chris Sanger
7 years ago

Likely will be sent home after showing up because of non-violent nature of crime and overcrowding, but still hopefully gets her and others’ attention

Jimmy Palmieri
7 years ago

Evil, wretched creature.