Public Review of Plans for 8120 Santa Monica Blvd. Set for Thursday

“Chicago in The Kicks of Route 66,” 2016 (YoMeryl), part of the mural along the 8120 Santa Monica Blvd. lot.

The City of West Hollywood will host a meeting Thursday night to get feedback from residents about interim plans for use of the empty lot on the southwest corner of Santa Monica and North Crescent Heights boulevards.

The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and will take place in the community meeting room on the first floor of City Hall on Santa Monica Boulevard at Sweetzer.

In 2015 the city purchased the lot, which is at 8120 Santa Monica Blvd. and is nearly one acre in size, from Walgreen’s, the drugstore company that had planned to open a location there. The cost was $7 million.

Walgreens had planned to build a shopping plaza with a drug store and other shops and 20 apartments on the property. But it announced in 2015 that it was selling the lot and was closing 200 of its more than 8,000 drug stores in the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

Oscar Delgado, the city’s director of public works, said the city doesn’t yet have a long term plan for the site. In the interim, he said, it plans to use it as a parking lot with approximately 95 spaces. That use will be the subject of tomorrow night’s meeting. Residents have expressed concerns about the possible presence of dry cleaning solvents and other materials in the ground, which the city will have to mitigate. The site has been officially identified as a “hazardous materials site.”

“The proposed parking lot will incorporate electric vehicle charging spaces, public art, the Weho Pedals bike share program as well as possible spaces for Zip Cars,” Delgado said in an email message to WEHOville. “It will truly be a multi modal location with trees and landscaping throughout.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shawn Thompson
Shawn Thompson
4 years ago

Just what we need Abbe Land Again? The residents clearly dont want lifers on city council by passing term limits. Let new faces be in new places. That is how a strong democracy works

Jim Chud
Jim Chud
4 years ago
Reply to  Shawn Thompson

Abbe Land?

Dan Morin
Dan Morin
4 years ago

BTW – Where were all you people when the meeting took place? Stop spouting off on WeHoVille, show up and participate.

Dan Morin
Dan Morin
4 years ago

Recently, Abbe Land has been making what seems to be a lot of public appearances. The word on the street is that she may be running for WeHo Council again.

Shawn Thompson
Shawn Thompson
4 years ago

All the mom and pops that were slowly evicted for this long drawn out project, that now is a dirt lot. Now this is why the #weho democracy is broken. Developer money AKA Abbe Land drove this project. Not the resident. Shes long gone. And we get a fence around a 7 million dollar spot

Joshua88
Joshua88
4 years ago

More affordable housing. Like the idea of green space on top, but it doesn’t make sense to garden/farm on the roof, in my opinion. We could do wonders with ground floor gardening, I am sure. This is very close to my home…
How long before remediation starts and finishes?
The air is so filthy here – how did it get so bad without freeways around the corner and no major industry?

tee
tee
4 years ago

I doubt making it a homeless shelter is going to go over well with the many people I know who pay crazy rents to live in WeHo but have to constantly deal with aggressive homeless whenever they want to walk anywhere. At any rate, I hope everyone who goes to this meeting (and ANY meeting like this) is civil. I’ve been to a number of them and the strident, childish entitlement by some of our residents (and other interested parties) can be stomach turning. Some people truly are just looking to be David vs.a (wrongly-perceived) Goliath (the City). Childhood issues,… Read more »

Jim Chud
Jim Chud
4 years ago

Oh I can’t resist – why don’t we have a design competition for a mixed use building that combines Affordable Housing w/roof gardens that provide not only Oxygen where it is sorely needed, but produce healthy produce that is good for everyone who participates. I also echo the suggestion of first or first and second level co-working space specifically for non-profits. WeWork has one location on La Brea and is moving in to two floors of the Red building at pdc – but the rates that they charge – especially for startups, is prohibitive. Shared offices enable lots of small… Read more »

WeHoVaudavillian
WeHoVaudavillian
4 years ago

Build a park. Do it. The City is park poor already – plant trees and provide shade and peace for people to relax

Ben McCormick
Ben McCormick
4 years ago

I echo the calls for a mixed-use affordable housing building with office space for some of WeHo’s many non-profit service organizations, maybe containing micro-housing for young people moving to WeHo to start their lives as has been mentioned in the past. Put a public park space on the roof away from the traffic below and dig deep for plenty of underground parking. When I investigated using the property for something last year, I was told by the City that soil testing for contaminates was being done last November. I’m assuming that nothing was found since no clean up has taken… Read more »

J Simmons
J Simmons
4 years ago

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwj8k9ab2LrVAhVJ4YMKHR0XCpkQFggtMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.weho.org%2FHome%2FShowDocument%3Fid%3D9073&usg=AFQjCNGKAYgjR4-U0zlYvIuVMvxKTNeRbQ

300 page recorded document for 8120 smb
See pages 290-300. Local residents letters concerned about underground toxic contamination expressing concern about walgreen (I imagine any construction requiring digging up the ground to pour a foundation.

Google pub recorded with county property info. At least 14 know serious toxic underground waste/contamination. What I suspect the real reason walgreens dropped the project, after leveling structures, but before touching/digging the ground pre construction.

see: http://www.realtytrac.com/property/ca/west-hollywood/90046/8120-santa-monica-blvd/51858577

icurbs90069
icurbs90069
4 years ago

Love the idea of integrating green space and definitely like the idea of more charging stations. However, the city needs to carefully consider how this is implemented. It is not cost efficient to pay $1+/hr to charge and also an hourly fee to park. This is the case with almost all of locations in Weho and reason why the chargers often set empty in pay lots/garages. Take a look at Santa Monica. They offer 2hr free parking and 2hr free charging in their garages and last I checked EV drivers can park for free at all metered stations. Other cities… Read more »

Randy
Randy
4 years ago

I agree that a space for non-profits is a great idea. A lot of them have been squeezed out of the city, and they are an important part of the LGBT community. I’d like to see more remain in West Hollywood, instead of being pushed out to other neighborhoods. Whatever they eventually build on this lot (once they figure out what to do about the ground contamination), I really, really hope for a rooftop park, like what was built on top of Restoration Hardware. Even if it is only for daytime use, more greenspace is desperately needed in this city,… Read more »

Click to Hide Advanced Floating Content

0 0 votes
Article Rating
24
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x