Board of Supervisors Votes to Examine Ways to Remove Sheriff Alex Villanueva

L.A. County Sheriff Alex Villanueva

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 today to look at options for removing elected Sheriff Alex Villanueva as the county’s top lawman, rather than waiting to see if voters will do so in 2022.

Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Janice Hahn dissented, saying the matter should be left in the hands of Los Angeles County voters.

Supervisors Mark Ridley-Thomas and Sheila Kuehl co-authored the motion
recommending that the county direct its lawyers, inspector general,
civilian oversight commissioners and acting CEO to look at possible avenues for removing the sheriff or cutting back his responsibilities.

The City of West Hollywood contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for law enforcement services, spending approximately $20 million per year. While several members of the West Hollywood City Council have been critical of Villanueva’s actions, the Council has not taken a formal stand on whether to ask for his resignation or whether he should be removed from office.  

Everyone on the Board of Supervisors has raised concerns about Villanueva’s lack of accountability, including his willingness to flout subpoenas issued by
oversight agencies. Yet the board split on this particular issue, with both
sides claiming the moral high ground of supporting democratic principles.

Ridley-Thomas — who tabled consideration of the motion two weeks ago
when Barger and Hahn first indicated their opposition — said the idea of an
elected sheriff was outdated.

“Despite the exponential growth of the county and tremendous advances
of modern-day policing, we are still beholden to this anachronistic model
of law enforcement,” Ridley-Thomas said, reading from an opinion piece he
wrote in 2014 for the Huffington Post. “We hold a popularity contest for
arguably our most important law enforcement position. The result is that we
have something worse than democracy — we have the illusion of democracy.”

Supervisor Janice Hahn said democracy dictated that voters settle the matter.

“It’s no secret that this board does not see eye-to-eye with this particular sheriff, and I have to point out that it’s not for lack of trying … this sheriff has acted like he’s not accountable to anyone but himself,” Hahn said. However, “(voters) can recall him or they can vote him out when his term’s up. That’s how democracy works … I don’t think it’s our job to remove an elected official.”

Supervisor Hilda Solis asked that consideration of a report back on the options be held until January so that Sen. Holly Mitchell, just elected to replace Ridley-Thomas, could lend her voice to the discussion.

The termed-out Ridley-Thomas, who was elected last week to replace Herb Wesson on the Los Angeles City Council, agreed to support Solis’ amendment.

The changes under consideration include amending the state constitution to move to an appointed rather than elected sheriff. Many activists said the current sheriff is just the latest flawed leader of the department and expressed support for a permanent shift to an appointed post.

Mark-Anthony Clayton-Johnson of JusticeLA recalled meeting with then-
Sheriff Lee Baca — who would later be convicted of obstruction of justice and
lying to the FBI — at LASD headquarters ten years ago as a moment that helped sparked a movement.

“We walked out of that meeting with a very clear and prophetic
mandate, knowing that whatever mechanisms of accountability and transparency and shifts in power for black and brown people that we were going to build had to be bigger than the denial of Sheriff Baca, bigger than the sadistic arrogance of (then-Undersheriff Paul) Tanaka, bigger than the rejection of subpoena power by (ex)-Sheriff (Jim) McDonnell, bigger than the expensive recalcitrance of Villanueva,” Clayton-Johnson said. “Four years is a long time to wait for a ballot box to check a rogue sheriff.”

Others worried about the board’s own expansive power.

“We definitely don’t want to give the Board of Supervisors more power, but we feel like we don’t have a choice because the sheriff is so out of control,” said Pastor Stephen “Cue” Jn-Marie of The Church Without Walls. “The sheriff is elected not mainly to exercise power but primarily to ensure public safety.”

A constitutional amendment to appoint rather than elect the Los Angeles County sheriff would likely affect all 58 counties in California and bring them in line with city jurisdictions, which appoint police chiefs. Other possibilities include pulling some of Villanueva’s responsibilities and appointing a county police chief, which Kuehl said she found most interesting.

Villanueva addressed the board during public comment, offering a wide-ranging account of all he has accomplished.

“I want to say, first of all, that there is an awful lot of bad information and false information out there, and we need to correct the record,” Villanueva said. “Because of my efforts since I took office, ICE is gone from jails and courthouses and patrol stations … body-worn cameras are now here to stay … the Banditos in East L.A., that clique has been broken up, people have been held accountable … the anti-clique policy that every previous sheriff refused to enact, I did enact.

“ … I have hired 1,100 deputies in one year, which is a record … our own sons and daughters from our own communities are now the ones serving these are people of color that we’re hiring,” Villanueva said before going on to list his department’s efforts to limit the spread of the coronavirus and expand outreach to homeless people living on the streets.

He closed with a plea to work together. Barger said she planned to take the sheriff up on his offer to meet and would aim to move forward in a spirit of cooperation.

“We cannot make long-term policy decisions based on the short-term
personalities that be,” Barger said. “I do not support many of (his) actions
and have significant concerns with (Villanueva’s) ability to appropriately lead
our sheriff’s department, but I do support the office, and more importantly, I
support our personnel.”

The civilian oversight commission has called for the sheriff’s resignation. Villanueva has dismissed the commission as a political tool — though it was instituted in response to jail violence that predated his tenure — and accused the group of punishing him for investigating potential county corruption.

As part of their argument for taking more drastic action, Ridley-Thomas and Kuehl highlighted what they characterized as Villanueva’s “inability to balance the LASD budget,” pointing to his unilateral moves to cut youth programs and eliminate the parks services bureau.

The board also voted Tuesday to request that the sheriff and the parks
department sign a new agreement by the end of this month to provide
security at county parks through June 30, 2021. If a new agreement is not
finalized by Nov. 30, the acting CEO will have the authority to reallocate
roughly $18.5 million from the sheriff’s budget to the parks department to pay
for security services.

Though the union that represents rank-and-file deputies has also
criticized the sheriff for failing to confer with them about closing various
bureaus and moving staff to new posts, it appears for now to support

In comments to the Los Angeles Times two days after the board’s last
meeting, the president of the Los Angeles Association of Deputy Sheriffs, Ron
Hernandez, slammed the board motion.

“I think they are blinded by their frustration and focused on the personality conflict instead of the safety of their communities,” Hernandez said. “Any elected body who is focused on finding a way to override the voters has lost touch with the constituents they serve.”

The Times editorial board has opined that the sheriff of the largest
local jurisdiction in the U.S. should not be an elected official.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Grace
Michael Grace
2 years ago

Of course, Hahn wouldn’t agree. Her family has had their political hands in Los Angeles for over a hundred years. Just more pay for play dreary politicians. Term limits now!

Michael Grace
Michael Grace
2 years ago

Let’s recall those three political hack Supervisors out of office who put us on lockdown again and of course sign the petition to have Gov Nuisance French Laundry removed from office. As far as Gascon goes, LA County deserves him because the voter continues to put in the worst politicians that should be on the shelf. I just hope he didn’t bring the street dung with him from San Francisco.

2 years ago

The same fools who voted for George Gascon will vote Villanueva out.
All my smart democrat/liberal friends and family in SF cringe and are in disbelief when they hear Gascon is now in LA. They all say he was horrific in SF and literally destroyed the city.

2 years ago

Hallelujah and fingers crossed! Even if Villanueva succeeds in completing his term, at least we can hopefully prevent a comparable situation from reoccurring with a future similarly arrogant and intransigent Sheriff. We can’t say we haven’t been warned by Villanueva’s example of what is currently possible! Credit to L.A. County Supervisors Sheila Kuehl, Mark Ridley-Thomas, and Hilda Solis for pursuing action. Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Janice Hahn are on the wrong side of this issue. Letting the voters decide in 2022 is the easy way out, and at best would be a too late, too small bandage for a growing… Read more »

2 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Agreed! Ignoring the law and legal oversight should have HIM arrested and jailed!

2 years ago

Removing an elected law enforcement official official, without that individual being tried and found guilty of a criminal offense that’s punishable by incarcerations a jail or a state prison, is a slippery slope for the LACO supervisors. If there isn’t criminal cause, your options are to hold a recall election. However, the citizens could launch a petition drive within the City of Los Angeles to have any or all of the Board of Supervisors removed through a special election. I’m sure there are a whole bunch of career politicians that the citizens would like to have removed there. However, I… Read more »

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
2 years ago

How can we examine ways to remove the Board of Supervisors?

2 years ago
Reply to  Jim Nasium

By circulating a petition to hold a special election to remove the seated individual(s) and have replacements run against the ones you want removed.

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
2 years ago
Reply to  Scot

You mean like the only possible way to remove an elected Sheriff? That sounds right. The BOS should have asked us.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x