Why the Hotel Ordinance is Bad for West Hollywood

By Nick Rimedio

Dear West Hollywood,

You may have read my previous op-eds on the Covid Road to Recovery as well as my commentary on the budget process that went into the city council approving it’s fiscal budget plan without studies for this upcoming Hotel Ordinance. In the latter piece, I alluded to the fact that I am proud to oversee a hotel here in West Hollywood, and that I planned to share some thoughts on the item prior to its consideration at the upcoming July 19 city council meeting. As promised, here are my thoughts below on why this piece of legislation is bad for West Hollywood- for its workers, its hotels, and our residents.

Workers

The Hotel Ordinance advocates have painted the hotels as horrible employers. They tout this ordinance as designed to protect workers as part of the “Build Back Better” ideology in a post COVID world, and to correct unsubstantiated allegations of abuse that they fail to corroborate with any specific examples outside of targeting one permanently closed hotel and a handful of isolated cases involving another property. When considering this rhetoric, I ask that you consider the facts below.

KEY FACTS#1: Per the City Staff Report, West Hollywood Hotels have had ZERO wage and hour investigations between 2010-2021. Per the California Department of Industrial Relations, West Hollywood Hotels have had ZERO complaints. Per the California Department of Fair Employment & Housing, West Hollywood Hotels have had seven (7) allegations filed in the last six years. With an average of 100 employees per hotel, West Hollywood Hotels employ more than 2000 people in the city. At an average of 1.16 allegations per year out of 2000+ employees who work with us on a full time basis, combined with the two above statistics, it is clear that West Hollywood Hotels go above and beyond to protect their employees.

KEY FACTS#2: West Hollywood Hotels already provide all of the real worker protections included in the ordinance as regulated by the state of California (industry training requirements, sexual harassment, human trafficking, HR practices including filing complaints and anti-retaliation protections) or by industry standard (panic buttons). Recall and Retention was codified by the state in April of 2021 with a sunset scheduled on December 31, 2024.

KEY FACTS #3: Mayor Lindsey Horvath spoke at the Santa Monica City Council Meeting on August 27, 2019 in support of their hotel ordinance. She said that she was “very familiar” with the ordinance and that she “hoped to follow their lead in bringing this ordinance to the city of West Hollywood” as she “knows that competition, regionally, is something that we banter about from city to city but in business as well” and that she was committed to “doing our part to even the playing field” with the city of Santa Monica. The basis of her comments was followed up by the statement that “we need to protect our workers in each of our communities” but she failed to deliver any specifics.She further stated that “anyone who comes before you tonight to say that they are doing sufficient training on sexual harassment and human trafficking isn’t being honest about the statistics and reality that we are seeing throughout Southern California.” This statement was also not followed up with any facts or supporting evidence, despite the fact that the hotel community followed up with her in the fall of 2019 in which she raised no specific concerns. In fact, in the nearly two years since she spoke those words at the Santa Monica city council hearing, Mayor Horvath has not taken any initiative to actively engage her West Hollywood Hotels with her concerns, or to investigate those concerns through city staff or the appropriate city commissions.

Key Facts aside, this ordinance hurts workers through the square footage regulation. Why? Because it sets a threshold of productivity, not seen in any other industry, where an entire shift is translated to double time wages if a worker exceeds the threshold. For the Santa Monica Ordinance, the threshold is set at 3500 square feet. This metric is not used in any hotel setting outside of cities with ordinances like this one, and falls below industry norms by 40%-50% including union hotels. The square footage regulation includes cleaning public spaces such as guest floor corridors, lobbies and public restrooms that require cleaning multiple times per day. With the penalty of paying double time wages for an entire shift, this effectively prohibits hotels from offering any voluntary overtime which can average 5-10 hours per week. It also reduces the number of rooms that housekeepers can clean by 40%-50%, which means that the cash gratuities left by guests is also reduced by the same amount per housekeeper. Combined, voluntary overtime wages and cash gratuities can amount to 20%-30% of a housekeeper’s annual income, so workers can expect to see that income reduction be realized if this ordinance is passed as originally proposed. Additionally, the team structure where there are employees who assist in cleaning rooms, similar to restaurants where bussers, host/hostesses, and food runners all assist servers in delivering service, would have to dismantled in the square footage scenario based on the ordinance impact to labor cost. That means that housekeepers would have to work completely alone whereas they previously had at least 1-2 people available to assist them as needed. The sum here is a 20%-30% reduction in pay combined with an actual heavier workload. Whether its a post-COVID world or a normal one, it’s obvious that the square footage regulations do not help workers.

Hotels

KEY FACT#1: Hotels, like restaurants, bars, and clubs, were completely decimated by the pandemic. Hotels went from running 80%-90% occupancies to less than 3% at the height of the shutdowns in 2020, and many closed temporarily. During 2020 and the first part of 2021, hotels were losing anywhere from $1 Million to $2 Million per month (or more) depending on their size. While PPP loans did help, there was no support in terms of mortgages of which almost every single hotel carries as part of their financial structure. While revenues have improved, industry forecasts predict that it will take at least another 1-2 years to return to 2019 figures. The recent announcement of the foreclosure of the Edition, which opened to notable fanfare in the fall of 2019, in addition to the closures of other West Hollywood hotels like the Standard is a sobering reminder of the truly fragile nature of our current economy.

KEY FACT #2: Hospitality, like many other industries, are facing an unprecedented shortage of employees in the post-Covid world, which is not only a West Hollywood issue but a world wide crisis. I know that there are some who essentially call this “Fake News”, but one google search can pull articles from the LA Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, and others. In fact, I have submitted a sampling of articles with links below for those who doubt the truth of this fact. The combination of extended and amplified unemployment benefits, relocation, and switching careers have resulted in a reality where West Hollywood hotels have collectively, at last count, 182 open positions. These openings remain despite many hotels offering incentives such as signing bonuses, referrals, and other benefits.

The reality here is that the ordinance truly cripples hotels who have fought to remain open or who reopened during the pandemic. Spikes in labor costs could cause other hotels to follow suit in either foreclosure or permeant closure. The labor crisis is real, which means that hotels cannot find the employees needed to double the staffing structure that the ordinance would require to operate under the 3500 square feet regulation. Some have suggested that we could afford to pay all housekeepers double time for their entire shifts to maintain current business levels. But, this simply is not possible as it would create multiple compensation issues with employees in other departments. Beyond housekeepers, hotels employ front desk agents, valets, servers, bartenders, bussers, dishwashers, facility engineers, and cooks among other positions. It is not difficult to imagine the fallout of paying one department double time wages and not others; it would be cataclysmic both in economic scope as well as personnel trauma. So, with the square footage regulations, hotels would have no choice but to limit the number of rooms that they sell because of staffing shortages which could result in dropping occupancy levels by 40%-50%. This is in effect what makes the ordinance a de facto “Tourism Cap” which has lasting consequences to the city’s hotel taxes and ultimately our residents.

Residents

KEY FACT #1: While occupancies are recovering for now (the recent mask mandate is a definite cause for concern that future shutdowns may occur this fall as the weather turns), the reality is that the hotels will need to make up for the monies lost in 2020 and 2021 which will take years to do so. The monies will go towards mortgage payments and capital investments that directly funnel back into the property. The capital investments mentioned ensure that hotels can renovate every 5-6 years on average, which allow it to remain competitive and able to generate strong revenues that directly drive hotel taxes. Those taxes go to the city which support resident and social services. Thus, municipal actions that reduce hotel occupancy or revenues have both short term and long term impacts to hotel taxes that support the city.

KEY FACT #2: Hotel Taxes and Sales Taxes (which are largely driven by tourism spend) have historically driven better than 50% of the city’s revenues. It must be noted that these dollars are unrestricted which means that the city can spend them however it chooses.

KEY FACT #3: The council majority has repeatedly dismissed calls for either economic studies (as suggested by Mayor Pro Tempore Lauren Meister and Council Member John D’Amico) as well as a suggested study session by new City Manager David Wilson. The city budget, with a projected deficit of $10 Million dollars, was approved by that majority on June 21 despite the multiple calls for study. The staff report on this item notes that it does not define any potential revenue impact (which is a result of the lack of economic studies), and only lists the potential cost impact of $500,000 for enforcement.

It is not an exaggeration to say that the residents carry the biggest unintended risk of any stakeholder. As residents, you elect your public officials to serve West Hollywood interests first and foremost above party politics or ambitions for higher office. You should expect that city budgets be sound and properly reviewed, and that any proposed legislation with any potential impact be considered very carefully with the appropriate studies. By Mayor Horvath’s own words in Santa Monica in August of 2019, her intention to bring this item forward was nearly two years in the making- why did she not instruct city staff to study this item well before the budget was presented? The reality here is simple. If you believe that all of publications noted above and listed below are “Fake News”, thenyou believe that there won’t be any impact by the ordinance to hotel taxes, and no subsequent negative effect on residents. But, if all of those publications are correct and the hotels are desperate for staffing, then the unintended consequence of the Tourism Cap will create an increase in the city’s deficits which will result in future reductions of resident and social services. Additionally, the continued reduction of the city’s reserves will eventually result in the downgrading of the city’s bond rating, which will increase the borrowing costs the city incurs for capital projects like West Hollywood Park. Does this sound like a prudent thing to do with an ordinance that in fact provides no new protections, reduces worker incomes, and threatens the largest revenue generator in the city with more foreclosures and permanent closures?

CONCLUSION

KEY FACT #1- All employees are protected by law to organize at their discretion to induce a collective bargaining agreement if they feel compelled to do so. In 2020, out of the city’s 21 hotels, only two hotels were unionized at the employees direction.

KEY FACT #2: Unite Here, the local hotel union, submitted a petition signed by hotel workers in support of the ordinance on the June 21 city council meeting. Two thirds of the signatures, over 60 employees, came from union hotels representing their own concerns for safety and fairness that occurs within their properties. The ordinance, however, exempts union hotels from the provisions despite no evidence showing how a union hotel is safer than a non-union hotel.

So, you may ask why the Hotel Ordinance advocates are pushing this without any regard for economic studies or a study session? I believe it is intended to create a toxic business environment for non-union hotels where it could become potentially cheaper for said hotels to unionize than to remain independent. The city cannot pass a law requiring hotels to unionize, so this is a back door attempt to do so. The fact that union hotels are exempt from this ordinance is an obvious testament to the questionable motivation behind its intent.

I cannot support such back door attempts for a special interest group to gain an unfair competitive advantage based upon a false premise of worker safety. This is why the West Hollywood Hotel Council sent the City Council a compromise package that affirmed all of the worker protections such as training and panic buttons that we would annually certify our compliance with either the Business License Commission or Code Enforcement. We remain strongly committed to protecting our workers income through their ability to earn voluntary overtime and maximize gratuities, and offered that the union’s own published standard of productivity be considered. Ultimately, though, we asserted that the city’s idea of regulating productivity in our industry, let alone any other industry, is an exhaustive and overly complicated use of city staff’s time and resources. The application of such complex municipal oversight is not consistent to the overall intent behind the ordinance in that it will provide worker protections. This is why we have requested that a housekeeper minimum wage be considered in removing the square footage regulations altogether. If there is desire to collaborate on a hotel wide minimum wage, we would work together with council on that initiative to find the solution.

In closing, please know that we as hotel managers deeply care about our workers. This is because many of us began our careers in hourly positions. I myself started as a busser and dishwasher in a restaurant 25+years ago. I was inspired to work for every promotion to ensure that I had the ability to take better care of the people that I considered my work family and friends. The pandemic was particularly devastating to us as we were forced to deliver the news of layoffs to most of our team members. That pain was followed by each of us remaining at our properties striving to keep them open, knowing that all of our efforts were committed to bringing our employees back to work. It was a singular mission where 2020 and 2021 was completely focused on reviving our businesses to make that a reality. Our work is not done as we are dedicated to not just return to pre-COVID staffing and revenue levels, but to actually exceed them in creating more jobs, revenue, and taxes for our city. I hope that you will support us in this great endeavor, and that you will consider to contact your city council members and ask them to rejoin us in building a stronger West Hollywood. 

PUBLISHED ARTICLES DOCUMENTING THE STAFFING CRISIS

LA/SoCal stories

Orange County’s Largest Hotel, Hilton Anaheim, Reopens– CBS KCAL 9

California stories

Newsom wants to ignite a post-COVID California boom. Here’s what could get in the way– Sacramento Bee

Labor shortage hits hospitality industry across Bay Area– KRON 4

Pack your patience as summer jobs go unfilled in national parks– Los Angeles Times

National stories

https://www.wsj.com/articles/many-jobs-lost-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-just-arent-coming-back-11626341401?st=oeey2wiqe20pzdo

Staffing Shortages Pose a Threat to Hotels’ Budding Recovery– Wall Street Journal

NYC’s pandemic-hit hospitality industry faces labor shortage a year on– Reuters

Hotels around the U.S. struggling to staff up before summer crunch– CBS News

Hospitality companies scrambling to fill gaps in workforce– Travel Weekly

Hotel industry emerges from pandemic with new business model, possibly fewer workers– Washington Post

https://skift.com/2021/05/07/hotels-see-big-jobs-jump-in-april-but-labor-shortage-crisis-still-looms/-Skift

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/losing-over-126-000-jobs-080000001.html– Yahoo

International stories

https://www.standard.co.uk/business/hospitality-staffing-crisis-restaurants-pubs-vacancies-b936253.html– Evening Standard

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/business/britain-restaurants-staff-pandemic.html– NY Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/03/business/france-workers-restaurants-hotels.html– NY Times

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ryan R Gierach
2 months ago

Presenting a long form piece in bold type is an innovation.
One I should hope never again occurs.

Reasonable Way
Reasonable Way
2 months ago

The only reasonable case/argument from someone that in 25 years has worked their way up the ladder from busboy/dishwasher to General Manager.

JJ1
JJ1
2 months ago
Reply to  Reasonable Way

Yup.

Phoebe
Phoebe
2 months ago

“We remain strongly committed to protecting our workers income through their ability to earn voluntary overtime and maximize gratuities.” This is the same rhetoric used by those who argue against paying their servers a living wage in lieu of relying on tips. What if a worker has a family to attend to, and can’t volunteer for that overtime? What if a string of guests doesn’t tip well? If you genuinely care about your workers, take care of them.

JJ1
JJ1
2 months ago
Reply to  Phoebe

There have been zero complaints from workers regarding wage for the last 10 years. This is just the union trying to get a stronger foothold in our city. Money money money.

Ryan R Gierach
2 months ago
Reply to  JJ1

Zero complaints?
Wow.
How is that even possible over a ten year period.
I don’t believe you’re a serious commentor.
I believe you’re a shill for the hotels.

Jamie Francis
Jamie Francis
2 months ago

To add to this point. The city of West Hollywood had to understand and should be aware that with California having 39 million people, 10 million in Los Angeles county alone this virus can’t be contained especially not in a county like Los Angeles! Government has to re-open somehow in the immediate future! Hollywood Melrose Beverly Grove Beverly Hills/West Hollywood had the highest uptick but most that tested positive had early access to doctors, disposable income/money tested last year but unfortunately in depressed communities with no viable access, immobile, homeless, have a distrust of government and doctors and unable to… Read more »

Jamie Francis
Jamie Francis
2 months ago

I’m very upset with the political maneuvering and more so the back room deals and over zoom texting that in-and-of-itself is wrong! No public discourse and preventing the residents and the public to engage their feelings, but will have a union or special interest groups get private phone lines and private meetings held. The city is becoming ever more comfortable with Zoom then private back channels then privatizing municipal government all in the name of SARS COV2! Now 8 variants later from wuhan variant then the Italian variant UK variant let’s not forget the statewide California variant in December then… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Jamie Francis
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago
Reply to  Jamie Francis

Could not agree with you more! City Staff has been loading the agenda with all sorts of policies that could have waited until COVID restrictions were lifted but then the pesky public might get involved. The Robertson closure shows what happens when the public process is short circuited. The infatuation with Zoom democracy really puts the public at a disadvantage.

Michael Grace
Michael Grace
2 months ago

You are right, the ordinance is very poorly written. If the goal was to unionize, why would the city ever set wages and minimums in this ordinance? Basically, you have three of the most dreadful people ever elected to public office aka Unisex No Urinals Public Toilet” three! Lindsay Horvath, John erickson, and Sepi Shyne. Two Hicks from the Midwest and a newbie from Iran. Lindsay Horvath wants a minimum guaranteed income for the entire state. Of course that’s necessary, cuz she’s really never had a real job. How could she? She is so busy with her meetings…she would attend… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Michael Grace
Ryan R Gierach
2 months ago
Reply to  Michael Grace

Your xenophobia is showing. Pull your panties back up.

Tracy
Tracy
2 months ago

Thank you for taking the time to explain this.

carflweton cronin
2 months ago

Several things come to mind after reading this piece: In 1958 joined the Seafarer’s Union because they were able to assist me in obtaining an able-bodied seaman’s papers while I worked at Woods Hoile Oceanographic; WEHO is a resort city highly dependent on its hotels, restaurants and there retail operation for the bulk of ,its income; Cannot understand the audacity of the city interfering in private industry regardless of alleged inequities. Does this union teach hotel housekeeping skills, promote advancement in that trade? Ask a reputable plumber about PIPE. The search for “equity” plows irregular furrows in plots.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago

But Carl the City was founded on correcting social/economic inequities; West Hollywood was established to enact a strong rent control to keep people in their apartments. This ordinance is in that tradition. The proposal just creates reasonable limits on what can be expected of hotel housekeepers. If the hotels want to avoid the expense of making someone clean more than 3,500 sq. feet, they can hire a couple more housekeepers at $16 or $17 an hour. That costs is minimal compared to the huge hotel CEO compensation packets that the NY Times recently reported on.

carflweton cronin
2 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Properly chastened, I withdraw any comments on the matter and will mind my own business in the future.

Jack Burton
Jack Burton
2 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Steve, you’re simply nothing more than another shill for the unions. Anyone that’s been in this city long enough, that has paid any attention to your anti business record, isn’t the least bit surprised that this is your opinion.
Hopefully these people keep this in mind when you launch your run for City Council, and show up to vote accordingly.
Then again the same SJW dopes that voted for the current Student Council might just grant your wish…

Jeremy
Jeremy
2 months ago

I live and work on the same street at a local hotel. My hotel is not in a union. We are a family. The managers are always gracious and we have holiday parties. This is America. Why do my bosses need to be replaced with union bosses.

JJ1
JJ1
2 months ago
Reply to  Jeremy

Because the union wants your money! And they’ll do anything to get it! Fight!

JJ1
JJ1
2 months ago

Thank you so very much for writing this and spelling out so clearly and precisely why this is bad for West Hollywood. I have lost faith in this current city Council. Lindsay Horvath being the biggest disappointment as she has aligned herself with Shyne and Erickson. They are making horribly uninformed decisions and totally disregarding the will of the public that put them in their seats. VOTE. THEM. OUT.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
2 months ago

Well said! Unfortunately few people will take on the task of reading this and will let their emotions guide them to an illogical and misinformed conclusion.

JJ1
JJ1
2 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

Sad but true. That’s how the two newest members of the city Council got elected this last election.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
2 months ago
Reply to  JJ1

Sepi and Erickson are always going to take the most radical position, no matter what the issue. That seems to just be the way they are made. I doubt even they realize it.

Moded00
Moded00
2 months ago

TL;DR: the “benevolent” managers doing everything the can to protect their profits at the expense of worker empowerment.

Click to Hide Advanced Floating Content

0
0
votes
Article Rating
26
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x